The Bombay High Court said that students with learning disabilities deserve sympathy Mumbai: Observing that students with learning disabi...
The Bombay High Court said that students with learning disabilities deserve sympathy
Bhamisha Singh, who was released in March 2016, the SSC examination took in all subjects, but was stopped when he could reach at least dozens of success in the information and communications technology to have received 17 of the 50 points.
The Council refused to examine the request to forward and said he had no authority to extend this service in the SSC examination. However, the court asked should spend the Council on the basis of government policies help students with special needs or learning difficulties.
"After careful study, including the response of the Council, as we believe that the facts and circumstances specific to this case, the Council would have tolerated the failure of the applicant in the election could," said a bench of judges and SC Dharmadhikari Dr. Shalini Phansalkar Joshi, are executed in a recent order.
"The performance of the petitioner in other subjects that are mandatory and can be viewed from learning disabilities are not poor or below a certain level. It has successfully done in other documents," the judges observed.
"It is true that this is a review of the Board of Directors and is for all students across the state. The (government) regime can not be extended and does not need the application of these tests carried out by the Council," the bank said.
"However, the board could not neglect the policies underlying these students to encourage them and is now part of the government decision of 8 January 2016, the Ministry of Education and school sport."
"These students are now developed part of the broader concept of the state party. They (the students) are now known as" Divyang "(off) and have specific requirements. The plan under decision of the Government, these standards extends students 1-12 "the bank said.
In one of the responses to the role of ICT, he wrote in answer that the word "blog" instead of "personal blog" that was the right answer, the Bank provided.
"It was found that the applicant a special student in the sense that she has a learning disability. For these students, it is expected that the respondents to be a bit friendly and fun," the judge said.
"To promote, if the performance of these students, the minimum or reached near minimum standards expected of the applicant is that some additional tags or grace that could be declared a success. And if the topic is not mandatory but an optional ~~ POS = TRUNC "she said of the bank observed.
"It is under these circumstances, and given that the responses of the applicant (in the subjects of information technology and communication) can not be considered completely wrong, but it is much closer to the correct answer as pure a special case and without this order as a precedent for are drawn to the applicant's request into consideration access, "the bank said.
"Communication (SSC Board) as the measure of this writing to the applicant stating and passed the test not because of its non-regulatory role of ICT canceled and set aside," she remarked the judges.
The HC directed respondents to consider the petitioner's case and get to pass a passing score on the subject, so that students can clear the exam published in the exam SSC Board of 2016 in March, that the year school from 2015 to 2016.
(This story was of a syndication not by the staff and NDTV - processed automatically generated Feed.)
